Data Flow Target Formula vs. Procedure Debugger Layout
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to review this query!
I am trying to understand why the algorithm in our target cube does not calculate properly when running the procedure. However, if we insert the same formula in an algorithm block in a Procedure Debugger Layout the algorithm block calculates accurately.
Any help is much appreciated!
Context:
In the image below I am creating a data flow to a target cube called "Opex Override Target Amt"(Block G)
This data flow does not execute properly.
The image below taken from the Procedure Debugger layout illustrates the discrepancy:
Cube Structures:
Thank you again!
------------------------------
Todd Choi
Consultant
Impetus Consulting Group, LLC
United States
------------------------------
Thank you for taking the time to review this query!
I am trying to understand why the algorithm in our target cube does not calculate properly when running the procedure. However, if we insert the same formula in an algorithm block in a Procedure Debugger Layout the algorithm block calculates accurately.
Any help is much appreciated!
Context:
In the image below I am creating a data flow to a target cube called "Opex Override Target Amt"(Block G)
- This cube will show Opex budget for an individual Cost Center by:
- taking the ratio of previous year Opex actuals of each Cost Center(Block by the previous year total of Opex actuals of the Entire Department(Block C) and multiplying this by a Target Amount(Block F)
- Also, the end user will choose a "Driver" in Block A to calculate this formula by either Prior Year% Expense or Prior Prior Year% Expense
- Thus, the target cube formula reads: if Block A = "Prior Year% Expense", then (Block B / Block C) * Block F, else (Block D / Block E) * Block F
- *Note: Block C and Block E are Totaled by Department and by Year
This data flow does not execute properly.
The image below taken from the Procedure Debugger layout illustrates the discrepancy:
- Block G is the target cube and did not calculate properly
- Block H was inserted as an algorithm block and copied the same formula as the target cube
- This block IS calculating properly
- I have also inserted a screenshot of the Cube Structures for your reference
Cube Structures:
Thank you again!
------------------------------
Todd Choi
Consultant
Impetus Consulting Group, LLC
United States
------------------------------
0
Answers
-
Dear @Todd Choi,
dataflow and layout algorithm can provide different outcome:
- dataflow is executed at most granular level and then aggregated at "layout level"
- algorithm is calculated at "layout level" which in your case is aggregated
e.g.
Dataflow: (10:5)+(10:5)=2+2=4
Algorithm:(10+10):(5+5)=20:10=2
Regards,
Leone
------------------------------
Leone Scaburri
Consultant
Board Community
Switzerland
------------------------------
-------------------------------------------0