Unable to Create Virtual Cube
Hello all :)
today one of our Procedures threw the following exception:
does anybody know this error?
Thank you
Kind REgards
wolfgang
Answers
-
Hello Wolfgang Dödlinger,
is it possibile that the temporary cube no longer exists?
Can you try creating a new temporary cube, is the result the same?Regards,
Daniele0 -
Hello @Daniele Santandrea,
thanks for your answer.
The cube is present - however there seems to be a problem with the dimensions.
Here (in the Layout in the DataFlow) the cube is supposed to have 11 dimensions, but only 9 are listed.
If I drop the same cube in the layout and replace this one (with itself) it says that the cube has 0 dimensions
in the procedure options, the cube has 10 dimensions
seems as if the cube is damaged or something - I'll try to copy the structure and use a new one (as you suggested)
Thank you
KR
Wolfgang
0 -
I can't create a new virtual cube or make any modifications to the procedure
…
KR
wolfgang
0 -
Hi @Wolfgang Dödlinger ,
I think that there is a problem with this procedure.
Can you create a new procedure or is the same error displayed?Regards,
Daniele0 -
I can create new procedures. However I cannot copy this one.
There is another procedure with the same problem.
I'll try to recreate it
Regards
wolfgang
1 -
@Wolfgang Dödlinger Thanks for posting your question to Community! Just to let you know, I am moving this discussion to the 'Platform' forum discussions to better align with conversations that are happening there.
1 -
Hello all,
the problem is now solved - I had to remake the Procedure.
It seems that somehow (I guess by moving capsules) the Procedure was damaged beyond repair.
Thank you
Regards
Wolfgang
2 -
Great @Wolfgang Dödlinger!
Regards,
Daniele0 -
Hello,
I have the same problem after I restore a database on the one I'm working one. Though the procedure is working on the original database, on the one where I restore I have the error message. Could you, please, help ?
thank you,
Catalina
0 -
Hi Catalina,
Is it possible for you to re-create the procedure once more, similar to what Wolfgang carried out in order to resolve the error?
Let us know if the above is feasible!
0