Level 306 : Q2 incorrect numbers coming through

Adetola Morgan · 2025-02-13T14:41:22+00:00

There was an error rendering this rich post.

Hello,

I'm at question 2 of the functional check in module 306 but my CY quantities for the 4 parameters are incorrect.

I have gone through the steps several times for my procedures and my cube visibility but I cannot seem to spot the issue.

Can I have a call setup to review this issue please?

Thank you

Find more posts tagged with

Accepted answers

All comments

John Williams

@Adetola Morgan,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Based on your screenshot, it appears there is a slight discrepancy.

Let’s collaborate to resolve this issue together.

Did you put the > symbol and see the number duplicated across all of the columns to the right, or did you just enter in the actual numbers without the symbol, as shown in the screenshot below?

Can you share a screenshot of your Indirect Costs procedure? Can you click the word "Options" on the Indirect Costs procedure and share a screenshot of that too so that I can see all of the dimensions in your temporary cubes?

Adetola Morgan

Hi @John Williams

I used the ">" as advised and my data entry auto-populated.

Here is the screenshot of my indirect costs procedure:

Adetola Morgan

Hi @John Williams just following up to see if there is any feedback or advice on this. Thank you

John Williams

@Adetola Morgan

I apologize for the delay. I've reviewed the previous community post regarding the 306 issue and also your Support ticket. I've informed our internal team about the situation and provided them with a summary of the issue, along with the steps shared by previous specialists. We're currently awaiting their response to identify the cause and determine the necessary resolution steps.

Thank you for your patience. We ask for a little more time as our support team is actively working on this to find a resolution.

Adetola Morgan

Thanks @John Williams I'm looking forward to an update.

I restarted my instance and started all steps from the beginning, but still having the same number results for FR0001.