Level300 part 1 : Module 306 : Functional test result gone wrong!

Suman Das · 2024-11-28T19:31:32+00:00

There was an error rendering this rich post.

Dear team,

I hope this message finds you well.

I am currently in the final module (Module 306) of the L300 course and have encountered some difficulties while attempting to match the solution during the functional test. Despite my efforts, I am unable to resolve the issue and would greatly appreciate your guidance or assistance in addressing it.

Could you please advise on the next steps or let me know if we can schedule a session to review the matter in detail? I am eager to complete this module successfully and ensure my understanding is on point.

My numbers are,

screencapture-academy-board-expanding-board-in-your-organization-part1-126939-scorm-3oxw3gjkktmyp-2024-11-29-00_58_14.png

I have cross checked the lessio several time, Need help on this.

Find more posts tagged with

Accepted answers

All comments

Marcus Smith

Hi @Suman Das,

Hope you're doing good.

Your issue has been raised with case number 00135747 to a dedicated team. One of our specialists will get in touch with you shortly.

Thank you,

Marcus Smith

Snehal Barot

Hi @Suman Das

Me or my colleague will reach out to you soon, to schedule a call with you to provide further assistance. It's hard to evaluate what might have gone wrong without evaluating that the build steps were completed correctly on the instance.

In the meantime, I would double check the steps of the PLN - Indirect Costs Allocation procedure, as it's likely the error will rest in there.

Regards,

Snehal

Suman Das

when we will have the call? @Snehal Barot. My instance will be deleted on 3rd dec.

TelDant

Hi @Suman Das , did you received reply to your question about the call? I’m also without time. 🙁

Suman Das

Dear @Snehal Barot ,

I hope this message finds you well.

I have cross-checked the procedure multiple times (at least 10) but have not been able to identify any errors. It’s proving to be quite challenging to pinpoint the issue. To expedite resolution, I suggest we arrange a call to review the procedure together. Collaborating on this might help us identify the error that has eluded my individual checks.

I understand that these types of errors can be hard to address through comments alone. To improve the debugging process, may I propose the following:

Since lessons are maintained module-wise, it could be helpful to prepare a list of debugging steps specific to each module. This could serve as a guideline for users encountering similar issues, ensuring a structured approach to troubleshooting. Generic instructions like “check this and that” or “review the entire lesson” might not provide the clarity needed to resolve complex errors effectively.

Looking forward to your response and to setting up a time for the call.